No introduction, read what it has...
Specifications
Engine Type
|
4-Stroke, 2-Cylinder, Air-Cooled, DOHC
|
Engine Displacement
|
487 Cm3 (29.7 Cu. In)
|
Bore X Stroke
|
74.0 Mm X 56.6 Mm
|
Compression Ratio
|
9.0 : 1
|
Transmission
|
6-Speed Constant Mesh
|
Overall Length
|
2080 Mm (81.9 In)
|
Overall Width
|
800 Mm (31.5 In)
|
Overall Height
|
1150 Mm (45.3 In)
|
Wheelbase
|
1405 Mm (55.3 In)
|
Ground Clearance
|
120 Mm ( 4.7 In)
|
Seat Height
|
790 Mm (31.1 In)
|
Curb Mass
|
199 Kg (439 Lbs)
|
Suspension Front
|
Telescopic, Coil Spring, Oil Damped
|
Suspension Rear
|
Link Type, Coil Spring, Oil Damped
|
Brakes Front
|
Disc
|
Brakes Rear
|
Disc
|
Tires Front
|
110/70-17M/C 54H, Tubeless
|
Tires Rear
|
130/70-17M/C 62H, Tubeless
|
Ignition Type
|
Electronic Ignition (Transistorized)
|
Fuel Tank
|
20.0 L (5.3 US Gal)
|
Performance:
This being an entry level “superbike” it has entry level
performance. In terms of power, the parallel twin engine is nowhere near the
GSXR600 but this bike is also nowhere near the 250cc bikes that Kawasaki and
Honda offer, and obviously it’s much more of a motorcycle than the glorified
bicycle called the Honda CBR 125. The power, and more importantly torque,
curves are very smooth from around 3000rpm to its redline of 11,000rpm which
means that around a busy city like Vancouver, you don’t have to rev the heck
out of the engine when accelerating from the stop lights. The bike weighs at
around 200kg and it has a very light feel to it. It doesn’t feel like it weighs
200kg and as a result it is an excellent handling bike that requires very
minimal input or corrections midway through a corner. The brakes unfortunately
are a bit of a disappointment, they are adequate for the bike around a city but
for country riding I believe this bike would benefit greatly from dual front
discs rather than a single front disc brake.
As the GS500F is
billed as a crossover of a beginner bike and a transitioning bike, the handling
is very friendly and forgiving. There
are a good deal of reviews that discuss this issue in depth so I will just go
over the main points. The low seat height gives a good grounded feeling and the
solid handling will give riders a feeling of confidence in turns as the bike
does not feel as if it is tipping over when compared to more traditional sport
bikes.
People’s opinion:
Good side:
I would have to say
this bike is one of the easiest and most forgiving bikes to learn on. I'm
currently on my P's and own a 2009 Suzuki GS500F. The design is simple and the
motor has been around since the 70s. The only downside I've had thus far is
attaching a Ventura Pack 'n' Rack. A slight modification is needed but nothing
you can't handle.
The bike is forgiving when missing gears, braking
hard and even when you slip over a little water. There's no dramatic lurching
when taking off and is great to learn throttle control on.
It's got enough get-up-and-go to keep up with most
other people and is great value for money. I won't be changing over for a few
years yet!
It looks pretty good,
it starts well even in cold weather for a car bed engine (Im talking 0'C here
guys) and its an all around un-intimidating bike. Lightweight. Good brakes.
Comfortable seat.
Bad side:
Power, Its so smooth you don't really feel it. Similar to
driving a V6 it seems like its going to throw you back but keeps you waiting.
Transmission, sloppy and often difficult to find neutral. Front suspension is
super soft. Dives all over the place under braking. Engine is noisy, valve
chatter? Fuel mileage suffers because I am on it so much. (Still better than
truck though). Ride position sucks when you get on the freeway, anything over
60MPH/100km/h strains the bike and you have to keep it open. Forget commuting
on it if your doing highway. Also the fuel starvation issue i had with the
petcock was annoying.
Overall I would have to recommend this bike to anyone
looking for a machine they will drive in town, not get too aggressive with and
arent looking for a quick bike that will "scare" them.